LITIGATION AND PRACTICE SUPPORT
35
ILTA's 2017 Litigation and Practice Support Technology Survey Results
Discovery Review and Management Tools (including all-in-one) (Select All That Apply)
2016 2017
Count % Count %
None/Not applicable
Both 2 28.6% 0 0.0%
Used by Outsourced Provider 1 14.3% 3 42.9%
Used In-House 4 57.1% 4 57.1%
Total 7 100.0% 7 100.0%
Case Notebook
Both 0 0.0% 1 4.3%
Used by Outsourced Provider 2 4.5% 3 13.0%
Used In-House 42 95.5% 19 82.6%
Total 44 100.0% 23 100.0%
CaseLogistix
Both 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Used by Outsourced Provider 1 4.2% 6 60.0%
Used In-House 23 95.8% 4 40.0%
Total 24 100.0% 10 100.0%
CaseMap/TimeMap/TextMap/
NoteMap
Both 2 2.4% 1 2.2%
Used by Outsourced Provider 1 1.2% 2 4.4%
Used In-House 79 96.3% 42 93.3%
Total 82 100.0% 45 100.0%
Catalyst
Both 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Used by Outsourced Provider 12 92.3% 10 100.0%
Used In-House 1 7.7% 0 0.0%
Total 13 100.0% 10 100.0%
Concordance
Both 3 5.4% 0 0.0%
Used by Outsourced Provider 5 8.9% 5 17.2%
Used In-House 48 85.7% 24 82.8%
Total 56 100.0% 29 100.0%
CS Disco
Both 2 25.0% 1 14.3%
Used by Outsourced Provider 4 50.0% 4 57.1%
Used In-House 2 25.0% 2 28.6%
Total 8 100.0% 7 100.0%
Equivio
Both 1 5.9% 1 10.0%
Used by Outsourced Provider 16 94.1% 8 80.0%
Used In-House 0 0.0% 1 10.0%
Total 17 100.0% 10 100.0%
EverLaw
Both 1 33.3% 1 10.0%
Used by Outsourced Provider 2 66.7% 7 70.0%
Used In-House 0 0.0% 2 20.0%
Total 3 100.0% 10 100.0%
