P2P

22 P E E R T O P E E R : I L T A ' S Q U A R T E R L Y M A G A Z I N E | F A L L 2 0 2 3 aspects, each with significant implications for data collection, analysis and legal proceedings. First, the goals and objectives of eDiscovery and digital forensics differ significantly. The former primarily focuses on identifying and producing relevant information for legal proceedings. Attorneys aim to uncover ESI that is pertinent to the case, ensuring its admissibility as evidence. This includes emails, documents, databases and social media content. In contrast, digital forensics has a broader scope, seeking to uncover and analyze digital evidence related to cybersecurity incidents and breaches. Attorneys engaging in digital forensic investigations delve deep into the technical aspects of the incident, aiming to identify the cause, extent and impact of the breach. They examine log files, network traffic, system configurations and other digital artifacts to reconstruct the timeline of events and assess the attacker's techniques. Legal standards and the admissibility of evidence also vary between the two methodologies. Electronic discovery, while subject to legal rules and procedures, generally operates within the framework of standard civil processes. The focus is on ensuring the authenticity and admissibility of electronically stored information. Digital forensics, on the other hand, often mandates more stringent adherence to forensic protocols and chain of custody requirements. For example, the nature of cybersecurity incidents demands a meticulous approach to evidence collection and preservation to ensure the integrity and authenticity of digital evidence in court. Technical legal IT professionals must be well-versed in each methodology's legal requirements and protocols. The level of detail and depth of analysis conducted in digital forensics are typically much more extensive than what is required in eDiscovery. Given the complexity of cybersecurity incidents, attorneys engaging in digital forensics delve into the technical intricacies of the breach. They analyze log files, network traffic, system configurations and other digital artifacts to reconstruct the event and ascertain the impact on compromised systems. In contrast, eDiscovery focuses on identifying relevant information in a more generalized manner, such as keyword searches and data sampling, without the same type of in-depth analysis. Technical legal IT professionals involved in digital forensics must possess advanced technical expertise to manage the complexity of the investigation. Timing and urgency considerations also differ between the two methodologies. Discovery often operates under strict time constraints, with deadlines for producing relevant documents and information. The rapid pace of litigation requires efficient data collection techniques to meet these deadlines. In contrast, digital forensics investigations may involve more thorough and time-consuming analysis. For example, cybersecurity incidents necessitate a meticulous and comprehensive examination of the compromised systems and networks, often requiring specialized tools and techniques to uncover the full extent of the breach. This can lead to longer investigation timelines and the need for ongoing monitoring and analysis. Lastly, the impact on cost and resources can vary depending on the complexity and scope of each methodology. Electronic discovery, with its focus on identifying and producing relevant information, can be relatively cost-effective depending on the volume of data involved. However, digital forensic investigations often require specialized expertise, advanced tools and extensive analysis, making it a potentially more resource-intensive endeavor. For example, the complexity of cybersecurity incidents may necessitate the involvement of cybersecurity experts, forensic analysts and technical specialists, all of which can increase the overall cost of the investigation. Technical legal IT professionals must carefully assess the resources required for each methodology and allocate them accordingly. Understanding these critical differences between eDiscovery and digital forensics data collection methodologies allows professionals to make informed decisions on which methodology to employ, allocate appropriate resources and develop effective strategies to protect critical client data. Importance for Technical Legal IT Professionals in Cybersecurity Law For legal IT professionals working in eDiscovery, grasping the differences between standard eDiscovery and digital forensic data collection methodologies is of paramount importance. This discernment holds significant relevance for several key reasons. First, effective management of data collection processes requires a thorough grasp of the specific techniques and methodologies employed in each field. Legal IT professionals need to familiarize themselves with F E A T U R E S

• Cover