Digital White Papers

LPS22

publication of the International Legal Technology Association

Issue link: https://epubs.iltanet.org/i/1487678

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 18 of 22

I L T A S U R V E Y R E S U L T S | L I T I G A T I O N A N D P R A C T I C E S U P P O R T 19 I L T A ' S 2 0 2 2 L I T I G A T I O N & P R A C T I C E S U P P O R T S U R V E Y R E S U L T S Which is the most frequently used collection activity? If you use document review software please list the top 3 tools used? Collection survey results shows a lack in any consistent method with mostly "None" and "N/A" answers for the various data sources. Targeted Collection (Non-Forensic) , 32 Self-collection, 19 Forensic collection, 5 Most Frequently Used Collection Activity If you use machine learning technology for review what top 3 software programs have you used? What are the top 3 quality control checks you have performed during/after document review? 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Axcelerate (Recommind) Brainspa ce Casepoint DISCO Everlaw FT K Centra l iConect IPRO | eClipse Logikcul l Nebula Nuix O365 OpenText Insig ht (Catal yst) Rela tivity / Relativi ty One Viewpoint Other Top 3 Document Review Programs 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Axcelerate (Recommind) Casepoint DISCO iConect IPRO Nuix Rela tivity Reveal - NexLP / Bra inspace Viewpoint N/A No Answer Other Top 3 TAR | Machine Learning | CAL Programs 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Sam pli ng (Sta tistica l and Other) Active Learning discrepancies Rely on Vendor Searches Ta gging Checks | Reconcili ng fa milies N/A Other Top 3 Review Quality Checking Methods

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of Digital White Papers - LPS22