P2P

31 I L T A N E T . O R G role in the organization. This can be done with separate coding panels for each set, limiting the number of tags needed for the review of each document. In the event leadership wants to more fully understand the magnitude of the breach, separating the confidential information review into distinct content areas can simplify the output for an effective and easily distilled executive summary. This approach does have its own challenges, however. Documents that are shared across departmental servers or among custodians could hit on screens for more than one review, increasing the total document count and potentially duplicating effort. To mitigate this, it is important to thoroughly examine the breadth of the content that can be found in each set by reviewing samples before finalizing the search terms and coding panels. When this is done correctly, documents reviewed in a given set can be eliminated from subsequent sets. In this case, reviewing one set at a time may be the logical approach to take, given this is being done on an internal schedule as opposed to a statutory one. There exists a plethora of skilled consultants with their own toolboxes that can be utilized to develop and implement a data breach remediation plan. The one that you choose for your organization should have significant experience doing this type of work and the flexibility to develop a process that fits the unique characteristics of the company and the breach itself. If, or more likely when, a data breach occurs at your organization, you may not always see it coming. Like the example of being hit by a drunk driver, there are some events that you know are possible but are still difficult to prevent and near impossible to predict. In order to protect yourself, you need to acquire as effective an insurance policy as possible. ILTA Andrew Goodman,AVP of litigation services at QuisLex, has over 20 years of experience actively managing and supervising large- scale, complex document reviews in numerous industries and practice areas. He has trained multiple large teams on document review and creating privilege logs and is currently responsible for spearheading QuisLex's litigation training programs. He also manages key aspects of QuisLex's client and vendor relationships. Goodman frequently speaks on topics related to e-discovery and legal project management. He received his J.D. and MBA from Washington University in St. Louis and earned a B.A. with honors from the University of Michigan. David Olener is the associate director of legal solutions at QuisLex. Olener has over 15 years of experience as a litigation and e-discovery attorney, providing discovery and review oversight for some of the nation's largest lawsuits and investigations. He began his legal career at Proskauer Rose where he first became involved with highly sensitive discovery matters. Subsequently, Olener advised clients regarding the selection and use of analytical and review technologies and developed data loss prevention policies for international organizations, utilizing proprietary enterprise software. Olener joined QuisLex in 2019 and is heavily involved with data breach and incident response matters. He received his B.A. from Franklin & Marshall College and his J.D. from Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, where he was articles editor of the Cardozo Law Review. 1. Bodoni, F. (2021, July 30). Amazon Gets Record $888 Million EU Fine Over Data Violations. Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-07-30/amazon-given-record-888- million-eu-fine-for-data-privacy-breach 2. Germany fines H&M 35 million euros for data protection breaches. (2020, October 1). Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-h-m-dataprotection/germany-fines-hm-35-million-euros-for- data-protection-breaches-idUSKBN26M5WM

• Cover