P2P

Winter2020

Peer to Peer: ILTA's Quarterly Magazine

Issue link: https://epubs.iltanet.org/i/1323358

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 53 of 74

54 P E E R T O P E E R : I L T A ' S Q U A R T E R L Y M A G A Z I N E | W I N T E R 2 0 2 0 F E A T U R E S New matter process requires using multiple sys-tems, often entering some of the same data more than once. SOLUTION: Single Data Entry: Custom front-end software can integrate with multiple sys-tems and output the correct information to each of those systems with only one entry on the part of the initiator. Remove repetitive entry entirely. Manual or partially automated Client/Matter Intake processes lack data validation, resulting in messy databases with errors or omissions. SOLUTION: Rules-based Data Validation: In a customized front-end, automate data clean- liness and compliance. Required fields can display dynamically based on the matter type and role of the initiator. Get all the correct data on the first try and keep databases clean. Lack of customization leads to acceptance issues, bottlenecks, and internal push back, wasting time and causing repeat work. Firms accept that they have to use workarounds with their application. SOLUTION: Fully-Custom Solution: keep existing applications, but add a fully customizable matter intake solution. Areas of customization can include: forms, data, routing, approvals, conditional events, exceptions & special circumstance handling, time-line enforcement, escalations, system integrations, automated system and re-minder notices, and automated or ad hoc reporting. Customization can change with time or adapt to newly added systems in the overall network. Approvals fail to align with the way a firm needs them to work, especially matters with exceptions or special circumstances. SOLUTION: Custom Approvals and Routing: Rules-based routing for standard and special circumstance approvals can easily accommodate a firm's unique circumstances and can easily adapt to re-organizations. This can also identify and route to the primary approvers or their designated alternates based on the matter type, in addition to other data-driven or threshold criteria selected on the form as it is completed. The Best Resources We Found A few articles really stood out. They focused on automation at law firms or reviewing legal-focused automa-tion solutions: American Bar Association Guide on Using Automation to Improve Your Practice Discusses new business intake, document management, accounts payable, billing, compliance, and client communication. An Attorney Provides a Detail-Rich Account of His Automation Efforts Explores client communication, scheduling, billing, new business intake, and document assembly and management. An Incredible, Comprehensive Review of 35 Current Legal Software Applications From Emerj, an AI research and advisory company, explore many current (and some cutting-edge) legal automation solutions. Covers areas like due diligence, case prediction, analytics, document assembly, billing, and more. ILTA Jeannette Russell is the President and founder of I-nnovate, a leader in law firm workflow automation and systems integration for nearly 20 years. She specializes in working with firms to leverage investments made with both contemporary and legacy systems by optimizing business processes that often see institutional resistance to change or adoption. Under her leadership, I-nnovate has assisted numerous AmLaw 200 firms achieve their digital transformation goals through high return software automation solutions. She can be reached at jrussell@i-nnovate.com.

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of P2P - Winter2020