ILTA WHITE PAPER: NOVEMBER 2015 WWW.ILTANET.ORG
17
Top 12 Objections
To Scanning and
Destroying Paper
About the Author
John Gilbert is Senior Vice President at nQueue, the leading provider of cost
recovery and document scanning and routing technology to the legal marketplace
worldwide. He has more than 25 years of experience in technology sales and
support to law firms across the globe and has been published in a variety of legal
publications, including Law Technology News, Peer to Peer, Legal Management and
National Law Journal. John can be contacted at jgilbert@nqueue.com.
About the Author
Bob Blacksberg is Principal at Blacksberg Associates, LLC, which was organized
in 2011 to provide consulting services focused on strategic and tactical analysis,
planning, design and implementation of technologies for law practice. His
experience spans two decades of technology consulting and implementation,
following a law practice in which he was a partner at two Philadelphia law firms.
Bob can be contacted at bob@blacksbergassociatesllc.com.
In law practice, staff responsible for information technology, records
and administration wrestle with the costs and effort devoted to miles of shelves
of paper files and seemingly innumerable boxes stored on and offsite. It has
become clear that much of the problem can be solved with a "less paper"
strategy, including the scanning of most new paper documents. However, these
scanning initiatives must survive objections frequently posed by lawyers.
Are objections from lawyers undermining your
efforts to reduce paper?
